Please note, Tim Murray works on the Renderscript team at Google and has a vested interest in the success of Renderscript. And he stating incorrect information here "because you're deciding the size of a group and when to synchronize within that group". As mentioned above you can let the runtime decide the group size.
Score: 37
Date posted: 8/12/2013

Python 3 throws a syntax error on the first example. Here's the first 2 lines updated to work on python 3: `for key, group in groupby(enumerate(data), lambda i: i[0] - i[1]): group = list(map(itemgetter(1), group))`
Score: 10
Date posted: 8/5/2016

@ypercubeᵀᴹ why do you say it's incorrect? This is exactly what I was looking for, and a correct interpretation of "group by multiple columns". In fact, I don't know why this isn't the behavior of "group by col1, col2" like I'd expect
Score: 9
Date posted: 4/28/2017

I bet your join conditions are not 1:1, remove the group by to see what's going on. By the way it's recommended to use explicit join syntax, rather than pre-92 implicit syntax.
Score: 5
Date posted: 10/2/2016

Is it giving you any error messages? Because it should. This _(SELECT products.products_id, products.product_reseller_account_no, products.product_certain_amount, products.product_stock_amount, products.product_group_number, products.products_status, products.products_competitor_watch, products.manufacturers_id FROM products GROUP BY products.products_id)_ is not correct syntax. You have a GROUP BY and lots of non-aggregate attributes that aren't in the GROUP BY in the select.
Score: 5
Date posted: 10/19/2017


3


© 2021 Search Overflow
Contributions licensed under cc by-sa